88% of IT Leaders Hit by AI Agent Security Incidents: Akamai & AvePoint Earnings React
AvePoint's Q2 survey revealed 88% of 750 IT leaders suffered AI agent security incidents, just as Akamai ramps cloud infrastructure to power AI workloads. Both companies' earnings show surging demand for security and governance in an era of agent sprawl.
Beat this week
Last 7 days · Threat Intelligence
Impact 5.8/10, unchanged. Counts are stories in our record, not a market forecast.
Open the change reportCoverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 11 percentage points.
This story sits in Threat Intelligence — the counts compare this beat's last 7 days with the previous 7 in our verified record, not a market forecast.
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record (as of ) The volume change compares this window with the prior 7 days in the same record. — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.
Cybersecurity briefing
Key takeaways
- AvePoint's Q2 survey revealed 88% of 750 IT leaders suffered AI agent security incidents, just as Akamai ramps cloud infrastructure to power AI workloads.
- Both companies' earnings show surging demand for security and governance in an era of agent sprawl.
- MarketBeat
- themarketsdaily.com
In this briefing
Mentioned
Key Intelligence
Key Facts
- 1AvePoint Q2 revenue rose 22% YoY to $124.5 million, with SaaS revenue up 27% to $98.5 million (79% of total).
- 2AvePoint annual recurring revenue (ARR) hit $465.1 million, up 27% YoY, with record net new ARR of $29.9 million.
- 3Akamai Q2 revenue was $1.1 billion, up 5% YoY, but non-GAAP net income fell 8% to $236 million ($1.59 per share) due to cloud infrastructure investments.
- 4Akamai signed a four-year, $600 million+ cloud infrastructure commitment with a robotics company, pushing total 2026 multi-year commitments to over $2.8 billion.
- 5AvePoint survey of 750 IT leaders found 88% experienced an AI-agent-related security incident in the past year; nearly 20% didn't know if employees used unsanctioned AI tools.
- 6Akamai’s GPU capacity is sold out, and it plans $500 million in additional GPU capex ($60M in 2026, rest in early 2027) to meet demand.
Trust will become the essential unifying layer for AI.
During Q2 earnings call discussing AI agent governance
AvePoint survey of 750 IT leaders
Who's Affected
Analysis
For cybersecurity teams already drowning in alerts, the rapid proliferation of AI agents is a nightmare. AvePoint's CEO Tianyi Jiang painted a stark picture during the Q2 earnings call: based on a survey of 750 global IT leaders, 88% encountered an AI agent-related security incident in the past year, and nearly 20% of organizations had no clue whether employees were deploying unsanctioned tools to create agents. Meanwhile, Akamai is selling out its GPU capacity, indicating that the very compute power enabling these agents is flooding the enterprise. As AI adoption accelerates, the security perimeter must expand to include not just endpoints and identities, but autonomous digital workers with unpredictable permissions and data access.
The second-quarter 2026 earnings from Akamai Technologies and AvePoint unveiled a technology sector increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence—one where AI is simultaneously the engine of growth and the source of new risks. Akamai, a legacy content delivery network now pivoting to cloud infrastructure and security, reported revenue of $1.1 billion, up 5% year over year. The standout was a four-year commitment exceeding $600 million from a U.S.-based robotics company, which propelled Akamai’s total 2026 signed multi-year cloud infrastructure commitments past $2.8 billion. Chief Executive Tom Leighton said the robotics customer would not materially contribute until 2027, signaling that while the pipeline is swelling, near-term revenue recognition is muted. Meanwhile, capital expenditures of $347 million—32% of revenue—underscored heavy investment in GPU capacity to support AI workloads; management said all available GPU capacity is sold out, and another $500 million will be deployed to replenish and expand inventory, with $60 million in 2026 and the remainder in early 2027.
Revenue climbed 22% to $124.5 million, driven by a 27% jump in SaaS revenue to $98.5 million, which now contributes 79% of the total.
AvePoint, a governance, security, and recovery platform, told a different but similarly AI-centric story. Revenue climbed 22% to $124.5 million, driven by a 27% jump in SaaS revenue to $98.5 million, which now contributes 79% of the total. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) reached $465.1 million, up 27% (24% constant currency), with record net new ARR of $29.9 million. CEO Tianyi Jiang focused squarely on AI-agent sprawl—autonomous agents proliferating across Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, and custom environments. He cited an AvePoint survey of 750 global IT leaders revealing that 88% experienced at least one AI-agent-related security incident in the prior year, and nearly 20% were unaware whether employees were using unsanctioned tools to build AI agents. Jiang positioned AvePoint’s Confidence Platform and the newly launched AgentPulse as a governance layer for enterprise AI, making trust “the essential unifying layer.”
What to Watch
The converging themes are hard to miss. Enterprises are racing to deploy AI, but they are doing so in an environment of fragmented controls. Akamai is benefiting from the sheer demand for compute—GPU-starved customers are locking in long-term contracts—while AvePoint is capitalizing on the messy aftermath of that adoption. The Akamai robotics deal, with its eye-watering $600 million minimum commitment, exemplifies how hyperscaler-like agreements are migrating to alternative cloud providers. For Akamai, it’s a validation of its strategy to re-architect around cloud-native AI infrastructure, even though the cost is pressuring margins (non-GAAP operating margin fell to 25%, and net income dropped 8% to $236 million). For AvePoint, the growth is a testament to the criticality of governance in an era when a single rogue AI agent can expose an entire organization. Its all-regions crossing $100 million in ARR, and the emergence of APAC to that threshold, adds geographic breadth.
Looking ahead, both companies face execution risk. Akamai must turn its $2.8 billion commitment backlog into revenue while managing chunky GPU procurement cycles that already pushed some equipment into Q3. AvePoint must demonstrate that AgentPulse can scale as a standalone product, not just as a bundle, and that its survey findings translate into durable enterprise spending. Investors will also weigh whether the AI tailwind can offset macro headwinds. The earnings calls made clear that AI is not a hype cycle but a tangible driver of infrastructure and security budgets, though the payoff timeline differs. Akamai’s 2027 revenue ramp and AvePoint’s land-and-expand within Microsoft ecosystems are bets on sustained enterprise transformation. For now, the message is strong: AI is generating unprecedented demand for both the pipes that run it and the safeguards that contain it.
Source cluster
Primary reporting
- MarketBeatAvePoint Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
- themarketsdaily.comAkamai Technologies Q2 Earnings Call Highlights
Cite This Page
"88% of IT Leaders Hit by AI Agent Security Incidents: Akamai & AvePoint Earnings React." Cyber Intelligence Brief, August 7, 2026. https://getcyberbrief.com/story/cyber-akamai-avepoint-ai-security-incidents-88-percent
How we covered this story
Every story in our cybersecurity coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.
Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the cybersecurity space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.
Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.
| Signal on this page | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Verified by N sources | Independent corroboration count. N≥2 is our confidence floor; N=1 is marked explicitly. |
| Impact score (1-10) | Regulatory + financial + operational weight. 8+ signals an experienced-operator action item. |
| Sentiment | Five-tier classification trained on labeled cybersecurity-specific corpora. |
| Timeline | Where applicable, the related-events sequence that contextualizes today's development. |