Threat Intelligence Neutral 5

BBB: 146K Scam Reports Show $5K Median Crypto Scam Loss

The BBB's 2025 risk index, built from 146,000+ Scam Tracker reports, ranks investment and crypto scams as the costliest threat at a $5,000 median loss while flagging a surge in smishing texts. For defenders, the report maps current social-engineering economics and confirms that SMS is becoming a primary initial-access and fraud channel.

· 4 min read · Verified by 2 sources ·

Beat this week

Last 7 days · Threat Intelligence

6 stories
6.3 avg impact
0% positive
83% negative
vs prior 7 days +1 +1 story vs prior 7 days

Impact 6.3/10 (+0.1 vs prior). Counts are stories in our record, not a market forecast.

Open the change report

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 83 percentage points.

  • 17% neutral
  • 83% negative

This story sits in Threat Intelligence — the counts compare this beat's last 7 days with the previous 7 in our verified record, not a market forecast.

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record (as of ) The volume change compares this window with the prior 7 days in the same record. — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

Cybersecurity briefing

Key takeaways

5 impact
Neutralsentiment
2sources
4min read
  1. The BBB's 2025 risk index, built from 146,000+ Scam Tracker reports, ranks investment and crypto scams as the costliest threat at a $5,000 median loss while flagging a surge in smishing texts.
  2. For defenders, the report maps current social-engineering economics and confirms that SMS is becoming a primary initial-access and fraud channel.
Drawn from
  • koat.com
  • kcra.com

In this briefing

Mentioned

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1The BBB Institute for Marketplace Trust analyzed more than 146,000 scam reports submitted to BBB Scam Tracker from the United States and Canada.
  2. 2Investment and cryptocurrency scams were the riskiest category, with a median loss of $5,000 for victims who lost money.
  3. 3Employment scams ranked second overall and were the top risk for people aged 18 to 34, with a median loss of $1,000.
  4. 4Online purchase scams were the most commonly reported fraud type, but carried a much lower median loss of $68.
  5. 5The BBB risk ranking weighs three factors: report frequency, how often victims lose money, and median dollar amount lost.
  6. 6The BBB advises never replying to unsolicited texts — even to 'STOP' — because any response confirms the number is active and can escalate targeting.
Median loss — investment & crypto scams
$5,000 Riskiest category of 2025

Highest median loss in BBB's composite risk index despite not being the most frequently reported scam

Analysis

The BBB's Scam Tracker data is a public threat-intelligence feed in disguise: 146,000 crowdsourced reports quantifying which social-engineering lures actually convert and what they cost victims. For security teams, the standout signal is the rise of scam texts — and the BBB's advice to ignore even 'STOP' replies reveals a key technical detail: any response validates a live number for retargeting, while embedded links remain the delivery path for credential harvesting and malware.

The Better Business Bureau's Institute for Marketplace Trust has released its annual assessment of the riskiest scams, built from more than 146,000 reports submitted to BBB Scam Tracker by consumers and businesses across the United States and Canada. Published on September 8, 2026, the report distills the 2025 threat landscape into a composite risk ranking that weighs three factors: how often a scam type is reported, how frequently victims actually lose money, and the median dollar amount lost. That methodology matters because it explains why the most common fraud is not the most dangerous. Investment and cryptocurrency scams topped the risk index despite not being the most numerous, because they combine a meaningful loss rate with the highest median financial damage: $5,000 for those who lost money. This category's severity reflects fraudsters exploiting urgency, the promise of outsized returns, and the practical irreversibility of cryptocurrency transfers, which makes recovery extraordinarily difficult once funds leave a victim's wallet.

Investment and cryptocurrency scams topped the risk index despite not being the most numerous, because they combine a meaningful loss rate with the highest median financial damage: $5,000 for those who lost money.

Employment scams ranked second overall and were the single biggest risk for adults aged 18 to 34, with a median loss of $1,000. The BBB specifically flagged fake work-from-home and online marketing jobs that require workers to deposit their own money or pay fees to access supposed earnings — a classic advance-fee structure that has migrated onto messaging apps and job platforms. These schemes frequently operate as 'task scams,' where victims are paid small amounts early to build trust before being asked to front larger sums. Beyond the direct financial loss, employment scams are a serious identity-theft and money-mule recruitment channel, because victims hand over personal data, bank details, and sometimes their own accounts under the guise of onboarding. For security teams, this demographic skew toward younger adults is significant: it indicates attackers are targeting a population that is digitally fluent but may have less experience recognizing fraudulent employment or payment structures.

Online purchase scams were the most commonly reported category, yet carried a comparatively modest median loss of $68. This is the high-volume, long-tail fraud of the digital economy: buyers pay for goods that never arrive or receive items that do not match the description. The low per-incident cost means individual victims rarely escalate, which lets attackers operate at scale across marketplaces and social media storefronts. The report's three-factor risk model deliberately downgrades these scams relative to investment fraud, but the sheer volume signals a broad and persistent abuse of consumer payment infrastructure.

What to Watch

The most operationally relevant trend for cybersecurity practitioners is the reported rise in scam text messages, or smishing. The BBB's guidance contains a notable technical nuance: consumers should not respond to unsolicited messages, even when the message invites them to reply 'STOP.' From a threat-intelligence perspective, any reply confirms to the attacker that the number is live, monitored by a human, and worth retargeting or selling to other fraud operations. Clicking embedded links, meanwhile, is the classic delivery mechanism for credential-harvesting pages, one-time-password interception, and malware. The BBB's recommendation to independently verify messages by visiting an organization's official website or contacting it directly is essentially an out-of-band verification practice — the consumer equivalent of the zero-trust principle that no inbound message should be trusted on its own.

For the cybersecurity niche, the BBB data functions as a leading indicator of attack economics. Consumer fraud and enterprise intrusion increasingly share the same initial-access playbook: smishing, fake job offers, and social-engineering lures that monetize urgency and trust. The $5,000 median loss in crypto and investment scams reflects a maturation of 'pig butchering' and related long-con tactics, while the surge in scam texts aligns with the falling cost and rising sophistication of AI-assisted message generation. The forward-looking implication is that smishing volume will continue to climb because it is cheap, reaches mobile users directly, and bypasses much of the filtering that has hardened email. Organizations should expect these consumer lures to double as reconnaissance and credential-theft vectors aimed at employees, making consumer-focused threat reports like this one a useful early-warning dataset for corporate defense.

Source cluster

Primary reporting

2articles

Cite This Page

"BBB: 146K Scam Reports Show $5K Median Crypto Scam Loss." Cyber Intelligence Brief, September 9, 2026. https://getcyberbrief.com/story/bbb-2025-scam-report-smishing-threat-intel

How we covered this story

Every story in our cybersecurity coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the cybersecurity space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.