Cybersecurity entity

Gartner

Company

security is the sole category represented across all 2 tracked stories. Of the tracked stories, 1 of 2 also mention Claroty, the most common co-covered peer. The 125-day window averages about 0.1 stories each week. They are less corroborated than the beat average, carrying 2.5 original sources each against 3.2 for the same window.

Last mentioned: Aug 27, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Gartner

2 stories
6.5 avg impact
100% positive
0% negative

Coverage balance Positive coverage leads. Positive coverage exceeds negative coverage by 100 percentage points.

  • 100% positive

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Gartner

security is the sole category represented across all 2 tracked stories. Of the tracked stories, 1 of 2 also mention Claroty, the most common co-covered peer. The 125-day window averages about 0.1 stories each week. They are less corroborated than the beat average, carrying 2.5 original sources each against 3.2 for the same window. At 6.5, the average consequence score sits below the same-window beat average of 7. This profile follows 2 Cybersecurity stories mentioning Gartner across the period from March 10, 2026 to July 12, 2026.

Stories tracked
2
Per week
0.1
Sources per story
2.5

Computed from the 2 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 417 Cybersecurity stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Gartner. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Stories mentioning Gartner 2

Gartner is linked from 2 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.